Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 D Haley <mycae@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kwizart@xxxxxxxxx | |) | --- Comment #3 from D Haley <mycae@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-19 21:11:41 EDT --- I hope no-one minds, but I have taken the liberty of updating this package, as it is blocking a package that I am keen to complete. SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jrosetta-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jrosetta-1.0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm *Sat Dec 20 2008 <mycae(a!t)yahoo.com> 1.0.1-2 - Fix build paths to prevent setup from asking for user input after multiple builds - Refresh source to match MD5. - Update patch to match path change - Corrected licence from GPL2+ to GPL2 I agree with the symlinking, as this is done in many java packages, where the version of interest is installed in %{name}-%{version}.jar, and then a symlink is made to this from %{name}.jar . Unless I have mis-interpreted the intent of the command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review