Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak <mnowak@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-19 15:53:07 EDT --- > License: Should probably be GPLv2, not GPLv2+: GPL v2 license is contained in > the tarball, but no source file (except those generated by the autotools) > mention it. I cannot find any note saying "GPL2 or later"... I believe the License field should state "GPLv2", but from different reason :). W.r.t the text from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses "" A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. """ The content of the COPYING file is not that important compared to what is stated in src files and docs. And frankly the only statement of exact license is in doc/devtodo.1.in .\" todo is licensed under the GPL, version 2. A copy of the GPL should have been distributed with the source in the file COPYING The pkg looks good to me, it's pretty similar to the one I did in now closed bug 477152. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review