Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-19 12:44:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 2.0.1 is an official release (actually the same as 2.0(.0) but with additional > license text in the lib part as I requested from upstream). Because of only > this little change no tarball was created by upstream. But the used tarball is > generated by upstream's system and consists of the release tag (not a certain > revision or trunk or something). - But as the tarball is created from svn system, please follow revision control tarball creation method (Using "Download GNU tarball" on SCM viewvc is not preferred) If this is after 2.0.1 release, you can follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages > Yes, I could modify the tarball but isn't it part of the guidelines that the > upstream's distribution shouldn't be modified unless there's some problems with > the contents? - Please see above (i.e. please create tarball by using "svn co") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review