Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 --- Comment #8 from Fabrice Bellet <fabrice@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-19 10:45:30 EDT --- Sure. The concerned packages are here : http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/ .fgfs-base is renamed to FlightGear-data .fgfs-Atlas is renamed to FlightGear-Atlas SimGear, FlightGear and FlightGear-data new versions are currently released upstream synchronously, with the same version numbers. FlighGear-Atlas and FlightGear are the only two packages that depend on FlightGear-data, so I updated their Requires accordingly. And no other package depends on FlightGear-Atlas. So I see no use in this case, to continue to provide the old names of these two renamed packages. (I'm maintainer for all the FlightGear-* packages, and comaintainer for SimGear, so I expect to update all these packages in rawhide at the same time) Does it looks good ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review