Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #20 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-19 05:16:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Thanks. Note that we do generally only use needinfo in package reviews as a > prod in the case one of the parties is not responsive. I didn't know that, and will try to remember that for future reviews. > I note now that 1.1.4 is not available from fedorahosted, and thus I can't > fetch the source. I'm not going to block the review over that as I'm guessing > it just hasn't shown up there yet. There was no problem with 1.1.3 and the > sources compared fine. Oops, my bad: I forgot to "make upload". Fixed here and for the other -docs packages. Thanks for doing the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review