Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2008-12-18 09:21:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Er, the spec/%{name} should be qd.spec, not qd-devel.spec. You should however > omit the %files section for the main package and only have one for the devel > subpackage. Right, since we want to be prepared for having a shared library. Otherwise the base name would have been qd-devel (as pstreams-devel and a bunch of other packages). http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-2.3.7-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review