Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-17 13:48:40 EDT --- Looks like Kevin now owns this package; updating the CC. I never found the time to get back to this, but I should be able to do so soon. The rpmlint complaint list is currently: agg.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 ['/usr/lib64'] agg.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 ['/usr/lib64'] agg.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libaggfontfreetype.so.2.0.4 ['/usr/lib64'] These are new since my last comment, and need tto be fixed up. agg.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 _Z8agg_mainiPPc agg.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 _Z8agg_mainiPPc These are OK as discussed above. agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libm.so.6 agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libm.so.6 These are not a big deal as discussed above, but are easy to get rid of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review