Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(opensource@xxxxxx | |ame) --- Comment #35 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-17 01:21:18 EDT --- > Btw. is there any need to require a certain version of ghc except for making > sure that the pkg_libdir exists, i.e. would it be possible to just use a > Requires: ghc, given that one can use some spec-fu to automatically build the > pkg_libdir path and Requires from the ghc version that was used to build the > rpm? Iirc it was only required in previous Fedora releases, to allow parallel > installation of different ghc version, which is not supported anymore. Actually this is breaking in mock/koji for me, but perhaps I am not doing it right. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1002891&name=srpm.log Till, could you have look or do you know another package that does something similar? http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-zlib/ghc-zlib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review