Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-16 13:37:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I'm confused about this whole obsoletes/provides issue > > opal-devel obsoletes openh323-devel > > but opal does not obsolete openh323 > > I don't get it. An explanation in the SPEC file as a comment would be useful if > you believe this is the right way. there's no need for them any more as the docs only require them to be kept for 2 Fedora releases, openh323 was replaced back in Fedora 6 or 7. I thought I'd already dropped them, apparently missed the -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review