Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-15 20:45:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > Actually, the prof packages should be seen as mandatory, not optional, so there > is no reason that there should be a flag to control whether or not they are > built. Bryan is probably right, we can probably drop the prof flag - at least I can't think of any cases profiling has blocked building a package: my reason for having it is really more to save time for debugging builds sometimes (either build time or time downloading ghc-prof), but for small libraries it probably doesn't make sense so I think it is safe to remove from the default template and then big libraries (like gtk2hs) might still have a prof build flag but that would be up to the maintainer. bcond looks better though: so I will use that for docs and other places/packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review