[Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768





--- Comment #5 from Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-12-13 09:27:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)

*
>> - summary should not start with "A" or "An"
> fixed

Really? I still see "Summary: A enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot" ;-)

*
>> - Remove the *.la files.  They should not be included.
> as you can see in the -4 spec, I manually remove it but have provisions in
> place to build a -static subpackage. I think just removing is better in this
> case but would like comments.

Removing definitely is better. Static subpackages are hightly discouraged in
Fedora; see packaging guidelines for details.


(quoting from the spec or rpmlint)

* 
> License: GPLv2
Looks more like GPLv2+ to me (or did I miss something?). 

*
> Requires: gdbm
Why is that needed? RPM automatically adds a requires for "libgdbm.so.2()",
hence please remove it if there there are no good reason for it.


*
>$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/jpilot-backup-* jpilot-backup-0.53-4.fc10.src.rpm 
>jpilot-backup.src: W: strange-permission jpilot-backup.spec 0600
>3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Please fix

* 
looks good apart from the above

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]