[Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452





--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-12-12 15:43:08 EDT ---
I do have questions about some of the other obsoletes, though.  After some
research I've found that "serviceconf" hasn't existed since RHL-8, and
"redhat-config-services" was in FC-1 (and RHEL-3) but nothing more recent.  Is
there any reason these days to bother obsoleting those packages?  We don't have
to worry about any kind of supported update from any release that might have
packages with those names, and Fedora guidelines talk about only keeping those
symbols around for two releases.

Removing them would trim off two rpmlint complaints, leaving just:
  system-config-services-docs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided 
   system-config-services
which is expected.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]