Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-11 20:38:08 EDT --- (Needsponsor was for Yaakov, but he seems to be too busy for fedora at the moment...) > Michel is already assigned to this, are you planning to review this, soon? Yeah Michel has not commented since Sept. Michel, if you are not available then I think we should let Till take over the review. :) > Are there any plans to get this also into F10? Sure, why not. :) Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11-1.4.5-1.fc10.src.rpm This needs rawhide ghc to build. (I am kind of hovering on whether the build_doc and build_prof build switches are overkill or not for general libs: sometimes they are useful - they do make the spec file a little more complicated but make clear which parts are for docs and profiling. The current templates I made have them though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review