Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa@xxxxxxxx | |om) Bug 470696 depends on bug 470694, which changed state. Bug 470694 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-11 19:13:08 EDT --- I've contacted both upstream for CNRI as well as Phusion Passenger; = CNRI = I've requested taking into consideration re-licensing the original mod_scgi code-base to a GPLv2-compatible license, and they promised me to have their CEO look into it. Should they choose to do so, I think that would kill both birds with one stone, wouldn't it? = Phusion Passenger = They are considering re-licensing Phusion Passenger (thus rubygem-passenger) to the MIT license. Would that solve the incompatibility issue? And, would that make the package's license acceptable for inclusion in Fedora/EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review