[Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544


Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(lemenkov@xxxxxxxx |
                   |m)                          |




--- Comment #19 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-12-11 16:42:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)

[sorry, skipped]

These comments should be added to spec-file. See

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment

> I've aggressively upstreamed patches from wpa_supplicant for a long time.  Some
> patches never will go upstream, but there's only one patch here
> (IW_ENCODE_TEMP) that's a candidate for upstreaming.

(In reply to comment #18)
> Also note that many of the patches marked "backport" above were only made
> available in the quite recent 0.6.6 release on November 23rd.


Ok, understood.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]