Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226412 Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-11 11:43:27 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM clean. rpmlint on RPMS: setup.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/securetty 0600 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). setup.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/environment setup.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/motd setup.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/shadow 0400 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). setup.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/gshadow 0400 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). setup.noarch: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /etc/profile.d This package owns a directory that is part of the standard hierarchy, which can lead to default directory permissions or ownerships being changed to something non-standard. setup.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/exports setup.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/lastlog This package contains files in /var/log/ without adding logrotate configuration for them. These should all be filed as rpmlint exceptions. Page in URL is default Trac page. Might want to look into that. :) Source tag needs to include a URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Should also be Source0, not simply Source. I don't see any license information in the source or the website, just the spec. Add something to the upstream documenting the licensing, then include it in %doc. Otherwise, very simple package, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review