Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-11 11:17:12 EDT --- Well, again would you tell me where it is indicated that this package is licensed under GPLv2+, not GPL+ (GPL at any version)? Note that just putting GPLv2 license text in the tarball does not mean that the software is licensed under GPLv2 (because of section 9 of GPLv2 license text). If there is GPLv2 license text, but no other files specifies the version of GPL, then it is regarded that it is licensed under GPL+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review