[Bug 225798] Merge Review: gimp-help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225798





--- Comment #3 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx>  2008-12-11 08:29:35 EDT ---
Sorry for the late reply.

I've fixed the following in CVS, gimp-2.4.2-2 is building with these changes
for Rawhide right now.

(In reply to comment #1)
> I reviewed this package. The following issues need to be addressed for
> compilance with the guidelines:
> 
> * The files AUTHORS, ChangeLog, COPYING, HACKING, NEWS, README, TERMINOLOGY
> need to be listed under %doc

These files get shipped except HACKING which is documentation about how to
change the documentation for which you need the source anyway.

> * The package owns
>    %dir %{_datadir}/gimp
>    %dir %{_datadir}/gimp/%{gimpsubver}
> which are also owned by gimp. Note that the package Requires: gimp. The above
> ownerships need to be dropped.

Not owned anymore.

> * %defattr(-,root,root,-) is preferred. 

Fixed.

> * BuildRequires: libxml2
> is not required since
>    BuildRequires: libxslt
> will pull that up
> 
> * Similarly
>    BuildRequires: docbook-style-xsl
> is not required. It will be pulled up by other dependencies. Am I wrong?

The configure script of gimp-help checks directly for e.g. xmllint (included in
libxml2) and .../xhtml/docbook.xsl which is included in docbook-style-xsl. I.e.
both packages are required directly, therefore I keep listing them as build
requirements. It doesn't matter that they in turn are required by other build
requirements, I don't want to rely on that this fact doesn't change in the
future.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]