Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #22 from Adam Tkac <atkac@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-08 06:57:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Is it possible to build this package in F-10 branch without "Obsoletes" > attribute? > Or is there a problem with that? > I think an empty folder is not a good idea. Also there is an problem, that this > package is included in pkgdb: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/tightvnc#Fedora10 > > I like tightvnc and real-vnc is not what I want. > Well, I can build tightvnc for F10 but I don't see reason for it. Current trunk tightvnc is forked RealVNC source - it is completely different from "old" tightvnc 1.2.9 & 1.3.9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review