Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-06 21:34:38 EDT --- This builds but won't install for me on either rawhide or F-10. I take it the needed version of system-config-date simply doesn't exist. It might be nice when opening a review ticket to note that the package under review can't actually be installed. The combination of Obsoletes, Conflicts and Requires seems rather odd to me. I gather you're trying to make sure that if the old system-config-date is installed, the new one along with the -docs package are installed at update time, but without having system-config-date require this package. That makes sense, but is the Conflicts actually necessary? I think the scrollkeeper dependencies are backwards. When I build this for F-10 or rawhide, the package comes out with a scrollkeeper dependency, but I thought scrollkeeper was gone. Either that or %{fedora} is 10 but %{rhel} is simply undefined and so 0%{?rhel} < 6 is true. I'm not entirely sure how the logic works out. Also, this package can't go into F-8 as it is closed to new branches, and certainly nothing less than F-8 is supported, so you can probably just drop the 0%{?fedora} < 8 conditional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review