[Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235





--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-12-06 21:34:38 EDT ---
This builds but won't install for me on either rawhide or F-10.  I take it the
needed version of system-config-date simply doesn't exist.  It might be nice
when opening a review ticket to note that the package under review can't
actually be installed.

The combination of Obsoletes, Conflicts and Requires seems rather odd to me.  I
gather you're trying to make sure that if the old system-config-date is
installed, the new one along with the -docs package are installed at update
time, but without having system-config-date require this package.  That makes
sense, but is the Conflicts actually necessary?

I think the scrollkeeper dependencies are backwards.  When I build this for
F-10 or rawhide, the package comes out with a scrollkeeper dependency, but I
thought scrollkeeper was gone.  Either that or %{fedora} is 10 but %{rhel} is
simply undefined and so 0%{?rhel} < 6 is true.  I'm not entirely sure how the
logic works out.

Also, this package can't go into F-8 as it is closed to new branches, and
certainly nothing less than F-8 is supported, so you can probably just drop the
0%{?fedora} < 8 conditional.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]