Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459212 manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-05 19:02:40 EDT --- Nothing much to review here, as it's just a bunch of data... GOOD: ==== SHA1sum corresponds with upstream c322fa81a57d39e150806917cb052bb370efa725 oolite-1.65-data.tar.gz license is OK ( GPLv2+ ) builds fine in mock Potential problems ================== rpmlint output: Source RPM: oolite-data.src:32: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/Contents oolite-data.src:33: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/Contents/ oolite-data.src:43: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/Contents/Resources/* --> What is the are these required by the game or oolite-data.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 12) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. --> esthetic bug, please fix before commit rpmlint of oolite-data: oolite-data.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib --> normal, as we have just data MUSTFIX ======= the folders below /usr/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/ seem to be left unowned and at the first glance oolite does not own them either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review