Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-05 19:35:11 EDT --- There seems to be a missing BR for some ssl-devel: checking openssl/ssl.h usability... no checking openssl/ssl.h presence... no checking for openssl/ssl.h... no configure: WARNING: SSL bundle will not be built: Could not find openssl libraries Is this intentional? Because if it builds with it, it should be included. Ref: devel 1. Why is "/usr/include/gnu-gnu-gnu" used as directory for include files (in -devel) ? I'd say that /usr/include/gnustep would look more "normal". After a quick glance over http://www.gnustep.org/experience/documentation.html I have not found any reference for "gnu-gnu-gnu". 2. %{_libdir}/GNUstep/Makefiles/ and /usr/lib64/GNUstep/Makefiles/Additional/ are unowned Ref: base I have built the package in mock on an x86_64 and I think that there are some issues: 3. Why is /usr/lib/x86_64/linux-gnu/gnu-gnu-gnu/ used and not /usr/lib64/gnustep ? 4. The name "pl" (/usr/bin/pl) is not really acceptable, under the terms of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace 5. docs should be built by default unless there is a very compelling reason to not do it. rpmlint has also a complaint about mixed use of spaces and tabs, please be as kind as to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review