Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #3 from D Haley <mycae@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-05 10:10:18 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-1.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Changelog * Sat Dec 06 2008 <mycae(a!t)yahoo.com> 1.2.1-2 - Removed latex build & buildrequires - Patched makefiles to provide shared instead of static libs - made doxygen log to file, due to excessively verbose output Rpmlint: SRPM:empty SPEC:empty RPM: $ rpmlint -iv RPMS/i386/stxxl-1.2.1-2.fc9.i386.rpm stxxl.i386: I: checking stxxl.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libstxxl-0.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. Now this is causing problems, If i put the link in the devel package it says it must be part of the package proper and emits an error. If I put it in the main, as I have done now, it emits this warning. The libstxxl-0.so is simply a symlink to libstxxl.so.0. Running ldconfig -n during %install instead of hand-cranking the symlink makes no difference, as the net result is the same. It simply makes the symlink using the soname of the so. This soname is the same value that I have set in the build patch (patch0). Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=981419 All succeeded. Issues: I don't build the user manual. This however can be grabbed from their sf page by users, so unless someone knows the solution off the top of their head to the latex problem, I will probably leave it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review