Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #18 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> 2008-12-04 11:42:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Hmm xdg-open failed in earlier testing on F9, but it seems to work for local > HTML files now on F10. In the past xdg-open couldn't handle local files > because it depended on prefixes like "http://";. Which past? xdg-open is a simple script, and it will fallback to firefox anyway. Now, maybe one of the framework xdg-open may use didn't worked (gnome-open, kfmclient, exo-open or mimeopen), without clearly erroring such that the BROWSERS list wasn't used, but this is not, in my opinion, a reason not to use xdg-open. > I would prefer to stick with > "firefox" for now to ensure that it actually works. I don't think it is wise to workaround xdg-open bugs that way; If xdg-open doesn't work it should be investigated, but using firefox, is, in my opinion, an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review