[Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-12-02 20:53:45 EDT ---
Builds fine and rpmlint is silent.

The documentation files are duplicated between the main and -devel package.

Unfortunately, modem.h and simd.h are far too generic to place in /usr/include.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
   e7a42c413a180b873ae76b2c252904a3e34c9807c2604f2315426443d9e28627  
   soundmodem-0.10.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  soundmodem-0.10-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm
   soundmodem = 0.10-3.fc11
   soundmodem(x86-64) = 0.10-3.fc11
  =
   /bin/sh
   chkconfig
   initscripts
   libX11.so.6()(64bit)
   libXext.so.6()(64bit)
   libXi.so.6()(64bit)
   libasound.so.2()(64bit)
   libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)(64bit)
   libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4)(64bit)
   libaudiofile.so.0()(64bit)
   libgdk-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
   libglib-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
   libgmodule-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
   libgtk-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
   libutil.so.1()(64bit)
   libutil.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
   libxml.so.1()(64bit)

  soundmodem-devel-0.10-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm
   soundmodem-devel = 0.10-3.fc11
   soundmodem-devel(x86-64) = 0.10-3.fc11
  =
   soundmodem = 0.10-3.fc11

* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
X generically named files
* scriptlets present OK (service management).
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers are in the -devel package.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]