Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #20 from David Carter <dcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-01 17:50:19 EDT --- The legal opinion is in. Looks like I'll have to some modification. >From Tom Callaway: "Unfortunately, it isn't okay. This is non-free, because there is no permission to redistribute modified versions of code under this license, only to "Make copies of the original file you download and distribute it". That, combined with: "Except as expressly stated above, HP and tang-IT grant no other licenses, express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, to any intellectual property rights." means that we cannot assume permission to distribute modified/derived works is implied. HP usually does a better job of this, perhaps they'd be willing to fix this license, or re-license this work under an established free license?" Stefan, any comments on the last paragraph? I know licensing held up the initial SDK release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review