[Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972


Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |ville.skytta@xxxxxx
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #11 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx>  2008-12-01 08:59:11 EDT ---
Looks like there's still some work here to do, reopening:

What's the rationale for the empty main package?  Shouldn't the *.so be
included in it instead of -devel?

The ldconfig calls are useless in the now empty main package.  I suppose they'd
be useless even if the *.so would be in the main one because there's no soname
in the *.so.

Specfile should be named libglfw.spec, not glfw.spec.

Empty debuginfo package and unstripped objects remain unfixed.  Fix for both
would probably be a matter of installing the *.so with 755 permissions instead
of 644.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]