Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #12 from Avi Alkalay <avi@xxxxxxx> 2008-11-30 08:10:59 EDT --- Suggestions incorporated. Please recheck http://avi.alkalay.net/software/miniupnpc/ Some notes: - The LICENCE file is still being renamed due to wrong spelling. - Package now includes an initscript and a sysconfig conf file. - To avoid a patch and to make it install correctly on x86_64, I included the following on %install: %ifarch x86_64 mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} %endif Can't test this. I don't have a x86_64 build system. rpmlint still outputs the following which I need some guidance on how to solve: miniupnpc.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so.3 miniupnpc.i386: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so.3 miniupnpc.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/upnpnats miniupnpc.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/upnpnats miniupnpc.i386: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/upnpnats upnpcnats miniupnpc.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/upnpnats miniupnpc.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name upnpnats -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review