Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-30 05:11:40 EDT --- REVIEW: MUST Items: + rpmlint is silent + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum afuse-0.2.tar.gz* 97b58a768ecb30696fb6c33dd8435b83 afuse-0.2.tar.gz 97b58a768ecb30696fb6c33dd8435b83 afuse-0.2.tar.gz.from_srpm [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review