Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-28 15:41:48 EDT --- I've just taken a quick glance at a mock build and there are several problems which must be fixed and also some improvements which I recommend MUSTFIX: according to the build log (and to your %files section), you are not compiling the shared libs, but you do compile static libs: [...] checking whether to build shared libraries... no checking whether to build static libraries... yes + %files devel %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.a You should do the exact opposite ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries ), unless you have a very clear motif (in which case a note should be added to the spec). Plus, static libs do not go into -devel.rpm but into -static.rpm. If you need both static and shared, then package both. MUSTFIX ecm-devel should require the base package RECOMMENDED please try to preserve the timestamps of the included files. probably make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" should do I have also noticed that configure complains about a missing xsltproc. Is it intentional or a missing BR? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review