Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter <fabian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-26 18:54:52 EDT --- You bumped the release of the spec file but there is no entry in the %changelog section. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs rpmlint is complaining about several things. rpmlint output [fab@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint miniupnpc* miniupnpc.src:59: E: files-attr-not-set miniupnpc.src:60: E: files-attr-not-set miniupnpc.src:61: E: files-attr-not-set miniupnpc.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 6) miniupnpc.src: E: summary-too-long Library and command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings. [fab@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint mini* miniupnpc.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so miniupnpc.i386: E: summary-too-long Library and command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc miniupnpc.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2 ['1.2-2.fc9', '1.2-2'] miniupnpc.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libminiupnpc.so.3 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review