Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-25 01:27:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > Honestly I would suggest that any templates or automated tools not have %files lists with > duplicated files so that less experienced packagers don't get the impression > that it is necessary to duplicate the license file or acceptable in general to > have duplicate entries in %files lists. Right - I will remove it. > I believe that with the patch in comment 42, this package is fine, and I'm > happy to see this through. Thanks for reviewing the first new haskell library package. :-) > I guess we need another guideline update to handle the changed scriptlets, though. Yep. Planning to rework the text, then rfc, and submit to FPC again for review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review