Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-24 22:20:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > There's no reason to include the LICENSE file twice, is there? Yes, probably not, but I think actually the -prof subpackage should not require the main package (just ghc-prof), so it would be possible to install -prof alone. Does that change anything? I am adding a little shell script called cabal2spec in ghc-6.10.1-5.fc11 which generates a ghc library spec files for a hackage tarball argument from cabal-lib-template.spec. It could also generate ghc-zlib.spec with build_doc and build_prof switches. See http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review