Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-24 00:25:39 EDT --- Everything looks good. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947334 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test passes cleanly. Source tarball matches upstream: dd3e9c804cb7f8d6755132d92b26a80a Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001.tar.gz dd3e9c804cb7f8d6755132d92b26a80a Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001.tar.gz.srpm Provides, requires and rpmlint looks sane: =====> perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm ====> rpmlint perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(Catalyst::Component::InstancePerContext) = 0.001001 perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext = 0.001001-1.fc9 ====> requires for perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Catalyst) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review