Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-23 10:40:19 EDT --- I've got a spec ready for 5.0.2 and was waiting for 5.0.3 to fix some problem I've reported upstream. For example, we shouldn't need to patch configure.ac for the jhall to javahelp2 jar detection (as the problem was reported upstream by me). I've also reported a problem with the default search path for the java machine using alternatives. I will upload a 5.0.3 spec/srpm once I'm back home. @D Haley About this: ----------- #Scilab installs lots of stuff to /usr/lib/debug and /usr/src/debug/ for some reason rm -rf /%{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/debug ----------- Those are debuginfo extracted by rpm. If you have a problem with them , then I would suggest that you review how your builsystem is done... thoses are expected to build fine and ends in %{name}-debuginfo rpm package. @Sylvestre According to our packaging standard. gluegen should be built separately from jogl, as we need jogl to be 'buildable' without using 'custom' Jar files at built time. (every jar file should be removed in prep). For some reason, separating the gluegen build from jogl isn't that trivial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review