[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639





--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-11-23 10:40:19 EDT ---
I've got a spec ready for 5.0.2 and was waiting for 5.0.3 to fix some problem
I've reported upstream. For example, we shouldn't need to patch configure.ac
for the jhall to javahelp2 jar detection (as the problem was reported upstream
by me).
I've also reported a problem with the default search path for the java machine
using alternatives. I will upload a 5.0.3 spec/srpm once I'm back home.

@D Haley
About this:
-----------
#Scilab installs lots of stuff to /usr/lib/debug  and /usr/src/debug/ for some
reason
rm -rf /%{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/debug
-----------
Those are debuginfo extracted by rpm. If you have a problem with them , then I
would suggest that you review how your builsystem is done... thoses are
expected to build fine and ends in %{name}-debuginfo rpm package.



@Sylvestre
According to our packaging standard. gluegen should be built separately from
jogl, as we need jogl to be 'buildable' without using 'custom' Jar files at
built time. (every jar file should be removed in prep). For some reason,
separating the gluegen build from jogl isn't that trivial.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]