[Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811


Lev Shamardin <shamardin@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |shamardin@xxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #2 from Lev Shamardin <shamardin@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-11-22 07:16:01 EDT ---
I'm not a sponsor, so this is not a formal review, but I hope this can
speed things up a bit.

- FAILED: rpmlint complaints:

php-pear-HTML-AJAX.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab:
line 50)

You shoud use spaces for indentation. Just expand all tabs.

php-pear-HTML-AJAX.noarch: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/php-pear-HTML-AJAX-0.5.2/examples/proxy_usage_server.php
php-pear-HTML-AJAX.noarch: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/php-pear-HTML-AJAX-0.5.2/examples/support/test.class.php

I see that you've tried to fix this issue in the %install script, but
you are iconv'ing wrong files. You should iconv files in
docdir/%{pear_name}/examples/

- PASSED: The package is named according to the Package Naming
  Guidelines.
- PASSED: Spec file name is ok.
- FAILED: The package dos not meet the Packaging Guidelines for PHP.

Please check with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP

A PEAR package MUST have:

BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR)
Requires: php-pear(PEAR)
Requires(post): %{__pear}
Requires(postun): %{__pear}
Provides:     php-pear(foo) = %{version}

post-scriptlets are fine.

- PASSED: The license is fedora-compatible.
- FAILED: The license specified on the project homepage is LGPL, the
  license specified in spec file is LGPLv3.
- PASSED: The spec file is written in American English in legible.
- PASSED: The sources match the upstream source (md5 verified).
- PASSED: The package may be successfully built.
- FAILED: Not all build build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
You should add at least dos2unix.
- FAILED: The package does not build in mock due to missing BuildRequires.
- PASSED: A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
- PASSED: Permissions are sane.
- PASSED: %clean section is fine.
- PASSED: macros usage is fine.
- PASSED: The package must contains code.
- PASSED: The package does not contain large documentation.
- PASSED: %doc contents is fine.
- FAILED: This package owns directory /usr/share/pear/HTML. It is
  already owned by php-pear-HTML-Common, so this package must Require
  it, and own only it's own subdirectory in /usr/share/pear/HTML.
- PASSED: There is rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the beginning of %install.
- PASSED: All filenames in rpm package are valid UTF-8.

Some other general notes:

You are packaging version 0.5.2 of the package which is a beta. There
is a newer upstream beta available. Could you please justify why are
you packaging an older release, or please upgrade to the newer
upstream version.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]