Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #6 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-21 19:56:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Our licensing page also covers this: > > " > A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that > it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is > technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the > version in whatever COPYING file they include. > " > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > Sorry, I didn't realize this. Changed to LGPLv2+ for now (and I'll talk with upstream about including a specific statement as to which version they intended). Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary-5.02-3.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review