Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 --- Comment #4 from Mathieu OUDART <services@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-21 18:15:31 EDT --- Thanks for the input Andreas. About the dependencies: i've had a quick test on fresh installs for Fedora9, CentOS5 and RHEL5 for the optional dependencies "wv xlhtml poppler-utils html2text" and unfortunately none of them resolves on all 3 systems :( That would really bother me if any Deki install failed because of these unresolved packages so I'd prefer to let them apart for now. about the spec: i applied your suggestions. I kept the %if conditions but tried to make it more readable. It's much more convenient to build from a single source on all platforms. wiki db update : I kept it for now considering that package updates can be done in the background/automatically. Upgrading the software files but not the db could result in a broken website until the sysadmin takes his actions. For the upgrade to be as safe and smooth as possible, I think it's better to update the wiki db schema at the same time we update the software files. about the %post : I let you have a look at it, I followed your recommendations. I now still have to figure out how to have users to complete the installation since I removed mozroots, mysqld start and all the output. Any best practices about that ? new links : Spec URL: http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki.spec SRPM URL: http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki-8.08.11722-1.1.src.rpm Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review