Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa <cooly@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-21 01:11:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is it possible to clean up the grammar in the %description? The last sentence > needs a period, I'm sure, but honestly I don't have enough context to be able > to parse it and suggest improvements. updated > I'm not sure how you arrive at "GPLv2" for the license tag; I can't find any > statement of the GPL version in use, which would indicate "GPL+". Have I > missed something? Package contains license text. See COPYING. > The package is missing the proper scriptlet dependencies for service and > chkconfig: > > Requires(post): chkconfig > Requires(preun): chkconfig, initscripts > Requires(postun): initscripts updated new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/ssbd.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/ssbd-0.10-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review