Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #24 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> 2008-11-20 17:25:54 EDT --- I'm confident that GPLv3 would be the correct choice for this package. GPL+ is correct when a package just includes the general GPL text (usually as COPYING) without being more specific anywhere else (because that's exactly what the GPL text says - any version of the GPL goes then). GPLv2+ on the other hand should be chosen only when something in the package actually explicitly says it is "v2 or later". The only mention of the license here is in the LICENSE file, and it is explicit about GPL v3. It would not hurt to ping upstream to include the whole GPL v3 text in the package and license notices in source files though, but that's not a requirement for the package to pass review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review