[Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-11-20 14:50:52 EDT ---
This one builds, and is rather simple.

I guess it might be nice to define QSO somewhere in your %description.  I guess
it makes sense to those who already know what it means, but it means nothing to
me.

This package should own /etc/qle

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
   2e948b64233ded37b80a3e77009f1006bce40428f857a01792f3dd2385a7edb3  
   qle-0.0.10.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK (maybe define QSO)
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   config(qle) = 0.0.10-2.fc10
   qle = 0.0.10-2.fc10
  =
   /bin/bash
   /usr/bin/perl
   config(qle) = 0.0.10-2.fc10
   cwdaemon
   hamlib-perl
   perl
   perl(Config::General)
   perl(DBD::SQLite)
   perl(DBI)
   perl(English)
   perl(File::Basename)
   perl(IO::Socket)
   perl(Tk)
   perl(Tk::After)
   perl(Tk::Bitmap)
   perl(Tk::ErrorDialog)
   perl(Tk::ItemStyle)
   perl(strict)
   perl(warnings)

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.  It seems to work when I run 
   it, although I've no idea how to do anything.
X fails to own /erc/qle
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* desktop files valid and installed properly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]