Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-19 17:43:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Documented: The DMTF Technical Committee chair sent an email to members of the > TC stating the Board's decision, and asking them to make this change in all > future published documentation and specifications. I would expect to see this > change in a future posting of the CIM Schemas tarball. A copy of that email would suffice for content (not code) distributed under that license. > As for the MOFs (which implement a form of the specification) as code vs > content, I have asked that the MOFs themselves be licensed under an explicit > license such as the BSD 3-clause that permits modification. There is a "MOF > Compiler". I am awaiting the answer to this. >From the context of this, I will assume the bits in the cim-schema packages are considered code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review