[Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575





--- Comment #10 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-11-19 12:45:39 EDT ---
When I looked at the generated RPM:s, with names like
libnautilus-vcards-0.2-1.48Msvn.fc9.x86_64.rpm, I hesitated. It just doesn't
look "right". 
These kind of names normally indicates some kind of snapshot or automatic,
nightly builds. 

Read the release guidelines over again. And removed the 'svn' part i. e.,
1.48svn -> 1.48. To me, it looks better, and seems to comply with the
guidelines. Thus the release would be 0.2-1.54, 0.2-1.73, 0.3-1.85...

Which leaves an open issue: under what circumstances should the 1. prefix
change? My feeling is that will be left constantly as '1.'. 

Looking at the kernel (uname -r) , I suspect they have something like
%version-%svnversion...

Eventually, maybe some sponsor could have a final word on this? For the time
being, I  stick to %version-1.%&svnversion

New URL:

http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/libnautilus-vcards-53.spec

(and, the "real" name still is libnautilus-vcards.spec, but sourceforge has
their policies...)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]