Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter <fabian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-18 19:50:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Can you please confirm if "mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}" is > actually necessary? I'd expect setup.py to take care of it. You are right, 'mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}' is not needed. > Anyway r+. Thanks! > > (you forgot to set fedora-review to ?) Did you do a full review? The flag is set to '+' but the bug is not assigned to you. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-analyze.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-analyze-8-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review