Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 --- Comment #3 from David Nielsen <gnomeuser@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-18 12:18:10 EDT --- as libglfw-devel is not available in F10 yet I can't complete the mock build required for the review just yet. I am also leaving for Brazil on the 22th of November and won't be home till the 18th of December so if you need this completed before then you will have to seek someone else to complete the review. I would suggest someone like spot who tends to be through in his reviews. Right now though, you can start by renaming the documentation package to doc to keep in line with the rest of Fedora. I also wonder if the examples wouldn't fit nicely in the doc package as well, I don't remember what the norm is here but I would think that example code would be a pristine form of documentation. You also alter the build system quite a bit, do you have a bug with upstream to track this, as well as the libdir stuff? It would be nice to not have to do that, admittedly cool looking, hackaround. rpmlint sayth: taoframework.src: E: invalid-spec-name taoframework.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 1) taoframework.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/taoframework-2.1.0/INSTALL taoframework.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/taoframework-2.1.0/COPYING taoframework-examples.x86_64: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/tao/examples/Data/PhysFsExamples.Simple.MyZip.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review