Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-15 12:02:16 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is (almost) silent: [petro@Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/otl-devel-4.0.176-4.fc9.noarch.rpm otl-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro@Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/otl-devel-4.0.176-4.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro@Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (BSD). + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum otlv4_h.zip* 16b07c774b737bd9fa0d8e0d3a569c67 otlv4_h.zip 16b07c774b737bd9fa0d8e0d3a569c67 otlv4_h.zip.from_srpm [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + No additional build dependencies + No need to handle locales + Does not contain shared library files + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT . + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Does not contain large documentation files + Does not contain %doc files + Header files are in a -devel package. + Does not contain static libraries + Does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files + Does not contain library files with a suffix + Does not contain any .la libtool archives + No a GUI application + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review