Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2008-11-13 16:23:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > OK. Now I get it to build and work in mock for Fedora 9 x86_64 using open64 > itself as compiler. > > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2-4.fc9.src.rpm Switched to RPM versions of prebuilt compiler, since the i386 binaries aren't available as tar files for some reason and the build fails. Now the only problem is that mock refuses to build the srpm in 64-bit distros (except F9 works well!), due to ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for /lib/ld-linux.so.2. Exiting. However this file is required for the binary compilers (yes, the x86_64 binary is 32-bit also). If one leaves it out one gets sh: /builddir/build/BUILD/open64-4.2-0/opt/open64/bin/opencc: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory I'm not sure whether this is a bug in mock, I'm asking the fedora-packaging list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review