Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-13 02:02:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Well I just packaged OTL, wasn't really challenging, but here it is: > > http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl-4.0.176-1.fc9.src.rpm > http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl.spec - Please create another review request for this package. By the way Some other maintainer names srpm/binary rpms which contain only C++ templete as "foo-devel" from the beginning: Example: bug 469808 > I probably won't even seek to get that included, but I thought of another lib > I've used in the past that would be helpful which is snmp++: > http://www.agentpp.com/index.html - This one does not seem to be in Fedora currently. > Btw, any chance to look at the latest quickfix spec file? Thanks. - Will check later... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review