Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-12 12:25:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #17) > > - I must say this srpm (tarball in this srpm) is problematic. > > > > Almost all codes in 2.8.1 tarball are still under GPLv2 (strict), however > > newly added tv_grab_ttx.pl is under GPLv3+, which are, unfortunately, > > incompatible: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix > > You need to fix license issue first. > > Upstream doesn't want to change the licenses and suggests to split out the Perl > script because it is not essential for the main application and can also be > used stand-alone. Is it possible/allowed to move it into a subpackage with a > different license tag? > > As the Perl script is still an experimental feature I could also exclude it for > now. This depends on how this perl script is related to the rest part of nxtvepg. If this perl script "uses" (i.e. depends on) the rest part of nxtvepg, then the license conflict cannot be resolved only by moving it into a subpackage and this script must be removed completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review