Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #34 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-12 02:48:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > I'm easy. Basically the package looks pretty good to me now, my only comment is that we need requires for all the install scripts I guess. Because of not needing haddock09 those would also look easier with dist-f11 in koji # for ghc-pkg and haddock Requires(pre): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(preun): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(postun): ghc = %{ghc_version} (they need to be versioned for ghc-pkg) > I'll be pushing a nearly-zero-day update of ghc 6.10.1 for f10 if I can. (It might be better to wait a little longer I think for ghc-6.10.1 to stabilise and also after seeing how much work it was updating f9 to ghc-6.8.3, but let's see how we go.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review